Why I'm OK with SXSW's 'Girls' Lounge'
Goodness, some people sure were fired up about the free manicures, hair and makeup that were offered to female attendees at SXSW at the Ipsos Girls' Lounge:
Yesterday, I read a blog post that perfectly summed up my feelings: "Femininity is not less than masculinity. It is a different kind of strength, but it is powerful and wonderful and deserves our respect. And that respect is way, way overdue. Why do we associate weakness with wearing lipstick? Didn't lipstick-wearing women do the tough task of giving birth to and raising many of us? Weren't suffragettes rocking high heels when they fought for, and won, our right to vote? Wasn't Rosa Parks in a skirt when she became the catalyst for a civil rights movement? There is nothing fragile about feminine power."
Women-oriented events at conferences, even if not perfect, create 'a flame around which to gather.' |
Before I weigh in, let me first confess that I've never been to SXSW
and that I'm unlikely to attend unless someone sponsors an Introverts'
Lounge.
So is theming a women's lounge around beauty sexist? Possibly. Is the name itself—the Girls' Lounge—in need of rebranding? Yep.
I concur with the folks who raised these very real objections and
welcome the fact that they deem it worthy of a conversation. Yet I see
so much online response objecting to the menu of services rather than
noticing three key things:
1. The services are optional. The sisterhood's the real draw.
Like it or not, women are the minority at tech conferences and many
tech events are so unwelcoming to women that they now list a "Code of
Conduct" on their websites so that participants will remember to be
respectful.
Until we achieve somewhere near parity in attendance (and speaking
roles), there's a need for places crafted to make women feel welcome.
I see things like the Girls Lounge more as an organizing principle
that's lightweight and fun than a mandate to "polish or perish."
Who cares if you partake or not? It's a flame around which to gather.
Not all men golf, play poker, or smoke cigars, but they're likely to
show up to a gathering that's a who's who of folks whose orbit they want
to be in.
Until the whole of SXSW is female-friendly, I can't fault pockets that
overtly state they are. I'm encouraged by the fact that the event had a
dedicated pumping room for breastfeeding moms and hope they'll consider
other policies like a No Interruption Policy on panels.
2. Good hair = catnip to speakers.
On the subject of finding female speakers, Nancy Hill, CEO of the 4As,
famously said, "Women are the last to commit, the first to cancel."
As a conference planner myself, I know how herculean an effort it is
for many women to get out of town for a speaking engagement. If the
beauty services of the Girls' Lounge allowed female SXSW speakers to
squeeze in a little confidence-boosting zhushing, then I'm all for it.
(In full disclosure, I got a blowout in Cannes at the Ispos Girls
Lounge, which was a half-hour of luxury that never would have survived
the relay race of my escape from home and work to travel 5,000 miles for
a voluntary appearance on the Palais stage.)
3. Pink isn't weak. Lipstick isn't bad.
On the heels of the worldwide "Like a Girl" phenomenon (thank you, Judy John), I'm left wondering when we decided that makeup was the enemy or that pink signified weakness.
When did we allow certain expressions of femininity (not all, mind you) to be categorized as uniformly diminishing?
Yesterday, I read a blog post that perfectly summed up my feelings: "Femininity is not less than masculinity. It is a different kind of strength, but it is powerful and wonderful and deserves our respect. And that respect is way, way overdue. Why do we associate weakness with wearing lipstick? Didn't lipstick-wearing women do the tough task of giving birth to and raising many of us? Weren't suffragettes rocking high heels when they fought for, and won, our right to vote? Wasn't Rosa Parks in a skirt when she became the catalyst for a civil rights movement? There is nothing fragile about feminine power."
I type these words with my ragged, unpolished fingers, attired in a
T-shirt and yoga pants, with my hair in a messy bun. This is heaven here
in Palo Alto. But if I'd been in Austin, you better believe I'd be
dipping my feet into a hot tub and chatting it up with the cool women of
SXSW.
While there, I'd pull the lounge organizers aside, thank them for
making women a priority, and gently suggest they make the beauty
offerings secondary and their business-minded guest speakers the
priority.
That's what I would do. How about you?
Kat Gordon is the founder of The 3% Conference, an event that
strives to elevate and expand female representation in media and
advertising. Follow her on Twitter at @KatGordon.
This Article Was originally posted at adweek.com/
2 comments
Write commentsFuelling up your rigorous workout sessions with the consumption of Crazy Mass is the best way to achieve a ripped body you have dreamt of. In addition, it also helps you to boost the natural testosterone production in your body. know More : http://crazymassstore.com
ReplyGet rid of frustrating hair loss and stimulate your hair growth by using Brivon, a clinically approved shampoo for healthy hairs. This shampoo is highly recommended by doctors owing to the quick result and no side effect. go to website - http://www.healthyminimarket.com/brivon/
Reply